Development Framework ===================== This demo project applies a traceability-driven development framework based on TDD and V-Model practices. It is intended to showcase how Toor Connect structures firmware development and traceability in practice. Toor Connect: `www.toorconnect.com `_ Framework Intent ---------------- - Demonstrate an end-to-end firmware method from client intent to verification artifacts. - Keep requirements, architecture, detailed design, verification, and implementation explicitly linked. - Provide a practical baseline that can be adapted to different sectors and standards. Core Principles --------------- - **TDD-oriented implementation:** implementation is guided by tests and detailed design. - **V-Model alignment:** definition stages are paired with verification stages. - **Incremental elaboration:** requirements guide architecture, and architecture guides detailed design. - **Continuous traceability:** every level references upstream intent and downstream verification. Lifecycle Steps --------------- .. list-table:: :header-rows: 1 :class: dd-fullwidth-table dd-no-filter * - Step - Purpose - Main Output * - 1. Client Intent - Capture goals, constraints, safety expectations, and integration context. - Shared technical brief. * - 2. Requirements - Define measurable, classified, testable requirements with acceptance criteria. - Traceable requirement baseline. * - 3. Architecture - Define components, interfaces, connections, and ADR decisions. - Traceable architecture baseline. * - 4. Detailed Design - Define SW units, relations, interface realizations, static and dynamic behavior. - Traceable detailed design baseline. * - 5. Verification - Define unit, integration, and acceptance plans and test cases. - Traceable verification baseline. * - 6. Implementation & Execution - Implement firmware and execute tests with evidence and defect closure. - Verified implementation baseline. Traceability Backbone --------------------- - Requirements trace to architecture components and SW interfaces. - Architecture traces to SW units, SW unit relations, and interface realizations. - Verification traces to requirements, SW interfaces, SW unit relations, SW units, and sequences/timing budgets. - Quality Assurance checks enforce core traceability consistency across the model. Adaptability To Sector Standards -------------------------------- - The framework is sector-agnostic and can be tailored to different ISO/regulatory contexts. - Adaptation is mainly done by tuning required rigor: - Evidence depth - Review gates - Verification scope and acceptance criteria strictness - The workflow remains stable while schemas/checks can be extended per domain needs. Review & Approval Gates ----------------------- .. list-table:: :header-rows: 1 :class: dd-fullwidth-table dd-no-filter * - Gate - Scope - Entry Criteria - Exit Criteria - Approver * - G1 Requirements Baseline - Requirement set and acceptance criteria quality. - Client intent and constraints captured. - Requirements classified, measurable, and reviewed. - Systems Lead * - G2 Architecture Baseline - Components, interfaces, and connections. - Requirements baseline approved. - Architecture traceability to requirements validated. - Architecture Lead * - G3 Detailed Design Baseline - SW units, relations, interface realizations, dynamic behavior. - Architecture baseline approved. - Detailed design traceability and consistency validated. - Software Lead * - G4 Verification Baseline - Unit, integration, and acceptance plans/cases. - Detailed design baseline approved. - Verification coverage and links validated. - Verification Lead * - G5 Release Baseline - Release notes, QA readiness, and baseline decision. - Verification baseline approved. - Release readiness checks pass and findings accepted. - Project Owner